Learning techniques in pursuit of Inclusiveness for Urban and Landscape Design
Keywords:perception, participatory planning, image tagging, non-representational, transdisciplinary
Inclusiveness can be considered a requirement for contemporary statements in urban and landscape design referring to age, condition, gender or nature. But how is inclusiveness influenced by spatial design? Can this relation be measured or proven? And more precisely, which interactions are considered across different generations or between human and non-human agents?
This paper describes student’s work evaluation procedures through a methodology consisting of selecting picture-based content from initial reference materials provided by teaching staff, as well as graphic material designed and produced by the students, to further analyze these through data visualization techniques and the production of info-graphics. In a latter step, a gearing game – which is a type of sociogram used to understand agents and matters of interest – is utilized to drive a discussion about design statements for further stages of development concerning students’ design projects.
The first stages of the methodology are strongly influenced by how the students perceive elements from reference materials and represent these in their own design productions. A literature review further investigates the dichotomy between representation and perception, and the generation of subjective images.
As a final consideration, this work aims to create combined methodologies by incorporating participatory observation methods (e.g. photovoice and flow charts) from the social sciences into urban and landscape design, as they are understood through an accurate design of the learning experience. Similarly, non-representational design and dataviz diagrams from urban and landscape design could potentially be implemented in the teaching of social sciences.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2020 Jose Carrasco Hortal, Jesus Lopez Baeza
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Anderson, B., Ash, J. (2015). Atmospheric methods. In P. Vannini (Ed.), Non-representational methodologies. Re-envisioning research (pp. 34-51). Routledge Advances in Research Methods.
Bouchain, P. (2013). Simone and Lucien Kroll. Una architecture habitée. Actes Sud.
Carrasco, J., & Abellán, A. (2015). Common Extra House Lab: Recetas para una ciudadanía en transición o aprovechamientos doméstico-colectivos en torno al bien común. Dearq 16, 30-43.
Carrasco, J., Abellán, A., Amorós, V., Bermejo, J., & Hernández, S. (2019). Sharing authorship and measuring influence in architectural trainings for urban dwellings and neighbouring communities. In O. Devish, E. Huybrechts, & R. de Ridder (Eds.), Participatory Design Theory. Using technology and social media to foster civic engagement (pp. 89-100). Routledge Research in Planning and Urban Design.
Cerrone, D., Lehtovouri, P., & Pau, H. (2015). A sense of place. Exploring the potentials and possible uses of Location Based Social Network Data for urban and transportation planning in Turku City Centre. Turku.
Certeau, M. de (1984). The practice of everyday life. University of California Press.
Cheng, Z., Caverlee, J., Lee, K., & Sui, D. Z. (2011). Exploring millions of footprints in location sharing services. ICWSM 2011(Cholera), 81–88.
Cook, I. (2005). Participant observation. In R. Flowerdew & D. Martin (Eds.), Methods in human Geography. A guide for students doing a research project (pp. 167-188). Pearson.
Devish, O., Huybrechts, E., De Ridder, R., & Martens, S. (2019). Introduction. In O. Devish, E. Huybrechts, R de Ridder (Eds.), Participatory Design Theory. Using technology and social media to foster civic engagement (1st ed, pp 1-11). Routledge Research in Planning and Urban Design.
Döring, N., Reif, A., & Poeschl, S. (2016). How gender-stereotypical are selfies? A content analysis and comparison with magazine adverts. Computers in Human Behavior 55, 955–962.
Francés, F. (2016). Metodologías participativas para la investigación y la intervención social. Universidad de Alicante.
Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review 66, 66-75.
Gibbs, M., Meese, J., Arnold, M., & Nansen, B. (2015). # Funeral and Instagram: Death, social media, and platform vernacular. Information, Communication and Society 18(3), 255–268.
Gisbert, E. (2016). An architecture by means of anthropology. Beyond learning the tools of social science. i2 journal 4 (1). https://i2.ua.es/article/view/2016-v4-n1-an-architecture-by-means-of-anthropology-beyond-learning-the-tools-of-social-science.
Hasse, J. (2011). Emotions in an urban environment: Embellishing the cities from the perspective of the humanities. In H. Schmid (Ed.), Cities and fascination. Beyond the surplus of meaning. Ashgate.
Hernández, S. (2013). eGlia Project. http://orsieg.es/wp_glia-evolucion-de-su-desarrollo/
Hou, J., Spencer, B., Way, T., & Yocom, K. (Eds.). (2014). Now Urbanism: The future city is here. Routledge.
Jakob, M. (2016, October 2018). Leggere il paesaggio: Strumenti, Metodologie, Rappresentazione [Conference session]. Conference ‘The technological origins of landscape’, Turin, Politecnico di Torino, Italy. http://www.dist.polito.it/news/allegato/(idnews)/8167/(ord)/1
Kesby, M., Kindon, S., & Pain, R. (2005). Participatory approaches and diagramming techniques. In R. Flowerdew & D. Martin (Eds.), Methods in Human Geography. A guide for students doing a research project (pp. 144-166). Pearson.
Leon de Aranoa, F., & Roures, J. (2005). Princesas. Mediapro.
López Baeza, J., Serrano Estrada, L., & Nolasco-Cirugeda, A. (2016). Percepción y uso social de una transformación urbana a través del social media. Las setas gigantes de la calle San Francisco. i2 journal 4 (2). https://i2.ua.es/article/view/2016-v4-n2-percepcion-y-uso-social-de-una-transformacion-urbana-a-traves-del-social-media-las-setas-gigantes-de-la-calle-san-francisco.
López Baeza, J., Carrasco Hortal, J., Abellán Alarcón, A., Carratalá Puertas, L., Francés García, F., & Llorca Asensi, E. (2018). Sobre la percepción: Etiquetado de material gráfico en talleres compartidos por Arquitectura y Sociología del Derecho. In R. Roig-Vila (Ed.) El compromise académido y social a través e la investigación e innovación educativas en la Enseñanza Superior (648-658). Octaedro
Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. MIT Press.
Manovich, L. (2009). The practice of everyday (media) life: From mass consumption to mass cultural production? Critical Inquiry 35(2), 319–31.
McCormack, D. (2015). Devices for doing atmospheric things. In P. Vannini (Ed.), Non-representational methodologies. Re-envisioning research (pp. 89-111). Routledge Advances in Research Methods.
Park, M., Luo, J., Collins, R., & Liu, Y. (2014). Estimating the camera direction of a geotagged image using reference images, pattern recognition. Elsevier 47(9), 2880–2893.
Parkinson, J. (2012). Democracy and public space. The physical sites of democratic performance. Oxford University Press
Probyn, E. (2015). Listen to fish. More-than-human politics of food. In P. Vannini (Ed.), Non-representational methodologies (pp. 72-88). Routledge.
Puig, M. (2017). Matters of care. Speculatives ethics in more than human worlds. University of Minnesota Press.
Ribot, A. (2018). Arquitecturas inclusivas. Estrategias de sistemas abiertos. In J. Ballesteros (Ed.), Pasajes de Arquitectura 147 (pp. 52-53). Reverse Arquitectura.
Schoffelen, J., Huybrechts, L., & Devisch, O. (2019). Documentation games. A comparison between three games to support participatory design teams to document their design process. In O. Devish, E. Huybrechts, & R. de Ridder (Eds.), Participatory Design Theory. Using technology and social media to foster civic engagement (1st ed, pp. 247-262). Routledge Research in Planning and Urban Design.
Thrift, N. (2008). Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect. Routledge.
Till, J., Blundell, P., & Petrescu, D. (2005). Architecture and Participation. Routledge.
Vannini, P. (2015). Non-representational methodologies. Re-envisioning research. Routledge Advances in Research Methods.